Maria Gallo, PhD, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Deliberate efforts to spread false information about contraception can involve established myths or new false messages. The rise of novel disinformation messages can be unpredictable because they are not based on science or evidence. Crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) are known to disseminate false claims about contraception. We propose to use artificial intelligence (AI) to develop ...Read more >
This study addresses two priority areas outlined by the Society for Family Planning’s request for proposals on contraceptive misinformation and disinformation: improving surveillance and understanding consequences. The project aims to generate actionable evidence that informs the development of a practical toolkit for US-based family planning providers combating contraceptive misinformation in clinical settings. Focusing on communities ...Read more >
April Bell, PhD, MPH, University of California, San Francisco
This mixed-methods study explores how Black adolescents use generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT to seek information about contraception and how these interactions shape their critical thinking, credibility assessments, and reproductive health decision-making. As adolescents increasingly turn to AI platforms to ask sensitive health questions, it is essential to understand the accuracy and potential ...Read more >
This computational research project investigates how contraceptive misinformation spreads and amplifies across digital platforms. Using natural language processing and AI techniques, it will: (1) analyze community-specific misinformation patterns across 8 social media platforms (Reddit, Twitter, TikTok, etc.) by examining rhetorical strategies and linguistic distortions in contraceptive discourse; (2) quantify algorithmic amplification biases through simulated AI ...Read more >
Lucia Abascal Miguel, MD, PhD, MS, University of California, San Francisco
Latinas face barriers to accessing comprehensive family planning services, including language barriers, limited access to care, and a lack of culturally relevant health information. These women are also increasingly exposed to contraceptive misinformation and disinformation online. On platforms like TikTok and Instagram, posts often exaggerate risks, stoke fear, and cast doubt on the safety of ...Read more >
Brianna Keefe-Oates, PhD, MPH, Maine Family Planning
Publicly-funded clinics are crucial for providing contraceptive care to individuals facing healthcare access barriers, especially in rural areas of the US. Rural areas experience significant healthcare challenges, such as longer travel times, fewer provider options, and healthcare professional shortages. Current threats to federal funding, from the freezing of some Title X funds to the recent ...Read more >
For over 50 years, the federal Title X program has been crucial in delivering sexual and reproductive health services across the US, particularly aiding low-income populations in accessing family planning care. Numerous studies have highlighted the program’s effectiveness in improving healthcare access and outcomes. However, as political divisions have intensified, Title X has been embroiled ...Read more >
This mixed-methods study will examine how contraceptive care and gender-affirming policies impact contraceptive access and decision-making among transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals in two contrasting policy environments: Washington and Texas. The study will explore how access to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and gender-affirming surgeries – either restricted or supported by state policy – affects contraceptive ...Read more >
Cynthia Chuang, MD, MSc, Pennsylvania State University
While the 2022 US Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization was about abortion, there is also evidence of its impact on both the demand for contraception and state-level availability of contraception services with the closure of family planning clinics that provided both abortion and contraceptive care. Medicaid is the largest payer ...Read more >
This project investigates contraceptive access within the complex legal landscapes of North Carolina and Virginia through in-depth case studies examining how state-level laws are designed, implemented, and experienced. The selection of these states leverages our established collaborative relationships with clinicians and reproductive health policy experts. While focused on two states, the research utilizes structured analysis ...Read more >
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkPrivacy policy