Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services are integral to the wellbeing of individuals and communities. However, societal dynamics of power and oppression pattern access to these services, presenting disproportionate barriers to younger people, BIPOC individuals, those with disabilities, individuals who are transgender or gender-nonconforming (TGNC), and people of lower socioeconomic status. One exacerbating factor for these health inequities is the social stigmatization of sexuality, which compels individuals to keep their utilization of SRH services private. In the US, one major threat to patient privacy is the paper trail associated with utilization of health insurance. When a person is covered by a parent’s or spouse’s insurance, information about the services the insurance reimburses is often shared with the primary subscriber, thereby breaching the person’s confidentiality. Leading health care organizations have called for policy change to correct this gap in patient confidentiality, and state governments are increasingly interested in policy solutions. Massachusetts is one of only seven states that has enacted legislation to protect confidential use of health insurance, and one of only five that extends such protections to commercially insured people of all ages, including legal minors. How this novel policy intervention has affected attitudes towards and ability to utilize insurance for sensitive health services has not been studied. We propose to fill this gap through a statewide, mixed-methods study that will directly query SRH service users on their knowledge of, attitudes towards, and intention to use the protections of the law, with the goal of improving future health policy interventions.