Intimate partner reproductive coercion (IPRC), a form of gender-based violence involving contraceptive sabotage, pregnancy pressure, and control of pregnancy outcomes, has recently been invoked in legal and policy arguments to restrict access to medication abortion. Some policymakers argue that mifepristone and telehealth-based abortion care enable abusive partners to coerce individuals into ending pregnancies, reframing abortion access – rather than abusive partners – as a source of harm. While evidence demonstrates that access to abortion can be protective for individuals experiencing intimate partner violence and that medication abortion is safe and effective, less is known about how these forms of care are experienced or navigated in the specific context of IPRC. This project addresses this gap by examining how frontline support workers (FSW) – including clinicians, advocates, and service organization workers – interpret and navigate IPRC in relation to mifepristone and different models of abortion care. Through qualitative interviews, this study examines (1) how FSW understand and respond to IPRC in the context of medication abortion access, and (2) how they assess the value of telehealth and clinic-based abortion care in shaping safety, autonomy, and risk for people experiencing IPRC. This study will provide timely evidence on how medication abortion and telehealth-based care shape safety, autonomy, and risk in the context of IPRC. In the context of a rapidly evolving health care policy landscape, findings will inform trauma-informed clinical care, support more nuanced research on IPRC in abortion contexts, and provide empirical evidence to inform ongoing legal and policy debates.